Positioning Before the Fed

While many businesses are solving problems at lightspeed, their payroll systems seem to stay stuck in the past. Deel's free Payroll Toolkit shows you what's actually changing in payroll this year, which problems hit first, and how to fix them before they cost you. Because new compliance rules, AI automation, and multi-country remote teams are all colliding at once.

Check out the free Deel Payroll Toolkit today and get a step-by-step roadmap to modernize operations, reduce manual work, and build a payroll strategy that scales with confidence.

Download the Toolkit for free today

Tomorrow afternoon, the Federal Open Market Committee begins its two-day meeting. Wednesday at 2:00 p.m. Eastern, Jerome Powell will stand at a podium and either hold the federal funds rate at 3.50 to 3.75 percent, cut it by a quarter point, or deliver language that surprises the market in one direction or the other. The futures market has been pricing in a hold with roughly 90 percent probability for weeks. Institutional desks already know what they think will happen. What they are doing right now is different from what you are probably doing. And that difference is the entire point of this issue.

I spent years on a quant desk where the 48 hours before an FOMC decision were the single most orchestrated window on the calendar. Positions were pre-staged. Hedges were calibrated. Cash was set aside. Volatility was shorted or bought based on a specific thesis, not a guess. And almost none of it had anything to do with whether the Fed would cut or hold. The actual decision is rarely the trade. The trade is the gap between what the market has already priced in and what the statement and press conference actually deliver.

Retail investors tend to do one of two things into a Fed week. They either freeze up entirely and hold cash because they are afraid of a surprise, or they lever up into whatever move they think is coming and get flushed when the reaction is the opposite of what the fundamentals seem to suggest. Both postures miss the point. A Fed meeting is not a forecast problem. It is a positioning problem. And positioning is a system.

Consider what just happened at the March 18 meeting. The Fed held at 3.50 to 3.75 percent, as expected. The Summary of Economic Projections still pointed to one cut in 2026 and one in 2027. Governor Miran dissented in favor of a cut. None of this was new information. The S&P 500 reaction was almost entirely driven by two things that were not in the consensus: Powell’s tone on the labor market during the press conference, and the subtle shift in the statement language around “the timing and extent” of additional adjustments.

That is the pattern. The binary outcome (hold versus cut) is usually priced. What is not priced is the second-derivative signal: the shift in dot plot dispersion, the rewording of a single sentence in the statement, the two or three minutes during the press conference where Powell answers a question about something adjacent to the decision itself. The edge is in those micro-signals, and institutions spend the week before the meeting preparing to trade them.

The implication for a non-professional investor is not that you should try to trade those signals. You almost certainly cannot, and the time-decay on short-dated options will eat you alive. The implication is that you should stop treating the meeting itself as an event that warrants portfolio-level action and start treating it as a moment to check whether your positioning is aligned with the rate regime you actually live in.

Here is what the current regime looks like, stripped of forecast noise. The upper bound of the federal funds rate is 3.75 percent. The two-year Treasury is yielding in the mid-3s. Three-month T-bills are paying around 4 percent. The ten-year is hovering near 4.2 percent. Inflation is running above the 2 percent target but has stopped its downward glide. Job gains have slowed to nearly zero on some monthly prints. The Fed is, by its own admission, waiting.

What that means, concretely, is that you are being paid reasonably well to hold short-duration cash instruments, you are being paid less than you should be to take duration risk in long Treasuries, equities are pricing in a soft landing that may or may not arrive, and the dollar is caught between a cautious Fed and a more cautious rest-of-the-world.

A portfolio positioned for this regime looks different from a portfolio positioned for an aggressive cutting cycle or an aggressive hiking cycle. It tilts toward shorter-duration fixed income, quality equity factors rather than pure growth, and a cash reserve that is large enough to let you act on dislocations without being forced to sell anything you own. If your portfolio does not look something like that, the question is not what to do on Wednesday. The question is why it does not look like that already.

The first is a liquidity audit. The week before a meeting, every institutional desk I ever sat on did a walk-through of what could be sold, at what price, in what timeframe, without moving the market. The point was not to raise cash. The point was to know where the cash could come from if it was needed. For a retail portfolio, the equivalent is simpler: look at your positions and mentally tag which ones are core (do not touch), which ones are tradeable (could sell for tactical reasons), and which ones are orphans (you own them but you do not remember why). The orphans are the ones you want to have already identified if volatility spikes and you want to reposition.

A tool like Empower’s free portfolio tracker is genuinely useful here, not because it will tell you what to sell but because it puts every holding across every account on one screen so you can actually see what you own in aggregate. Most retail investors are shocked by the concentration they discover the first time they do this. A 40 percent allocation to a single sector hiding across three different accounts is not a position. It is an accident.

The second is a volatility check. Institutional desks look at the VIX, the MOVE index (which tracks Treasury volatility), and implied volatility across specific single names and ask a simple question: is the market pricing in enough uncertainty for what could actually happen? If the answer is no, they reduce gross exposure. If the answer is yes, they look for pockets where volatility is overpriced and sell it. For a retail investor, the version of this that actually matters is checking your equity exposure against what you could tolerate if the S&P 500 dropped 5 percent in a week. If the honest answer is “I would panic,” your exposure is too high, full stop, regardless of what the Fed does.

The third is a thesis refresh. Before every meeting, desks write down what they believe the Fed will do, what they believe the market has priced in, and where the gap is. Most of the time, the gap is small and the honest answer is “do nothing.” The discipline is in forcing yourself to write it down, because the act of articulating your view reveals how much of it is actually based on data versus narrative. A retail version of this might be: write one paragraph explaining what you think the Fed will say, what the market currently expects, and whether the difference is big enough to change anything in your portfolio. In nine meetings out of ten, the answer will be no.

Do not buy zero-day-to-expiry options on the S&P 500 to “trade the Fed.” The implied volatility is already elevated, you are paying a premium for the event, and even if you are right about direction you can lose money on the vol crush after the announcement. This is a classic retail trap. Desks that trade 0DTE on FOMC days have specific, narrow setups built around positioning flow and dealer gamma. You do not have those setups.

Do not try to front-run the statement language. Bloomberg terminals compare the current statement to the prior one in milliseconds. By the time you read a headline on your phone, the move has already happened.

Do not cash out entirely because you are nervous. Sitting in cash the week before a Fed meeting is one of the most expensive habits in retail investing because you almost never get a clean re-entry. The market drifts, you wait for confirmation, and you miss the move. If your long-term allocation is right, leave it alone.

Do not add leverage based on a conviction trade. If you are wrong, leverage turns a five percent drawdown into a fifteen percent drawdown. If you are right, the unlevered version of the trade would have made you plenty.

Check your cash balance. If it is less than 10 percent of your liquid net worth, use the days between now and the decision to move excess checking account cash into a short-duration Treasury fund or a high-yield money market. You are leaving roughly 4 percent on the table by letting it sit in a regular bank account. The next MSL issue will go deeper into Treasury ladder construction, but in the meantime, this is a trivial, near-free adjustment.

Re-read your investment policy statement, assuming you have one. If you do not, write one. Two paragraphs is enough. State your target allocation, your rebalancing rule, and the specific circumstances under which you will deviate from it. A Fed meeting is not one of those circumstances. A 20 percent drawdown in equities might be. The point of writing it down is to remove the meeting itself from the decision space.

Identify one position you would sell if your portfolio were down 10 percent next week and you needed to raise cash. Just one. Do not sell it now. Knowing the answer in advance is the entire exercise.

Automate what you can. If you are still manually moving money between accounts every time you rebalance, you are burning time and you are going to skip the step when it matters most. Platforms like M1 Finance let you set target allocations and auto-rebalance, which removes the emotional component from the step that matters most. The goal is to make your system fire even when you do not feel like firing it.

Here is the thing nobody tells retail investors about professional trading desks. The good ones are boring. They pre-stage their positioning. They write down their theses. They check their liquidity. They size their risk. And then, on the day of the event, they mostly watch, because the work was already done. The people who show up on a Fed day scrambling to make decisions are usually the ones who blow up.

You do not need to trade this meeting. You need to make sure your portfolio is aligned with the regime you actually live in, your cash is working instead of sitting, and your allocation reflects what you would hold if Powell said nothing at all. Do that, and the rest is noise.

The Wealth Architecture Blueprint covers the full institutional positioning framework, including how to build an investment policy statement that actually holds up under pressure, the three-bucket cash system that lets you stay invested through any rate regime, and the eight-step portfolio audit I run on my own accounts every quarter. To get the Blueprint, reply BLUEPRINT to this email and I will send it over.

If you want the quarterly portfolio audit checklist on its own, reply AUDIT. It takes about 30 minutes to run through, and it is the single most leveraged half-hour you will spend on your money this quarter.

Share MSL with three people and I will send you the Portfolio Positioning Playbook for free. Ten referrals gets you lifetime premium access to everything I publish. Your referral link is in the footer.

The DTC beauty category is crowded. To break through, Jennifer Aniston’s brand LolaVie, worked with Roku Ads Manager to easily set up, test, and optimize CTV ad creatives. The campaign helped drive a big lift in sales and customer growth, helping LolaVie break through in the crowded beauty category.

Learn more